P3D Re: Can't see it? Is it there?

[jacob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Gabriel Jacob)]

I said:
>> Conversely the image can be good aesthetically but
>> technically poor. I think a good image should be judged
>> on both aspects, but this is only my opinion.

Mike K. replies:
>I think the image *has* to be technically adequate in order
>to be aesthetically good.  And to me, being aesthetically
>good is the point of having the image, so if one thinks 
>an image aesethtically good, then the judging need
>go no further -- the end goal has been reached.  The
>opponent's King chess piece has been captured.

I agree, (see above original quote of what I think a good
image is) but some judges don't seem to think so.

Gabriel


------------------------------