Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

P3D Re: RBT Wars!


  • From: "Greg Wageman" <gjw@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: P3D Re: RBT Wars!
  • Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1998 15:36:25 -0800


From: Peter Davis <pd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>


>I'm confused.  Does this or doesn't it use standard interframe
>spacing?  I'd like something that produces film indistinguishable from
>that exposed in a standard SLR, so it can be commercially processed
>easily and reliably.  Sounds like even with the 75mm spacing, this
>camera doesn't quite do that.


In a normal SLR which has a single film gate, the inter-frame spacing is
determined solely by the film advance mechanism, and is usually fairly
consistent in a properly-working camera.  The inter-frame spacing of the
XnB cameras is determined both by the (fixed) spacing of the dual film
gates and the (variable) 1-3-1 advance sequence.  So there can be some
variation in the amount of space between pairs, since two different
factors are contributing.

However, I have never had a problem using a variety of different film
processors (multiple Kodak labs and Fuji).  They all seem to cope with
the variance just fine.

     -Greg W. (gjw@xxxxxxxxxx)




------------------------------