P3D Re: PHOTO-3D digest 3100

[Peter Davis <pd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jason Shen wrote:
> I think the traditional stereographs failed in many reasons: inconvenience,
> not natural, distortion of image, high costs, etc. The most important
> reasons I think are inconvenience and distaortion of images. I am not a
> stereo professional. My feeling is that I do not like to wear a pair of
> glasses to view every stereographs except for my first curious. The
> lenticular solved the convenient problem but it distorts the original images
> and produces poor quality of photos. Our barrier technology is totally
> different with the old one. The technology of our calculations for
> parameters from shootings to processing is mature so that it is much sharper
> and clearer. And our costs of processings are much cheaper than the regular
> lenticulars. The two problems solved plus low costs open large markets
> ahead. Our products exported to Japan, Hongkong and even to the United
> States. In near future, people will see more our products in the markets.

Is it just me, or is anyone else still baffled by how this actually
works?  How does the barrier technology present separate left and
right eye views without requiring glasses, viewers, lenticular
screens, or some such thing?

Thanks,

-pd


-- 
--------
                             Peter Davis
                      http://world.std.com/~pd/


------------------------------