P3D 3D PHOTO?

["ron labbe" <ron@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Marvin Jones writes:
>The fact that the original picture is flat doesn't make the 3D
picture of it any less 3D.<

Well, Marvin- that begs the question:

Is a "3-D picture" without parallax 3D?
I would say it is not.
(One may argue about the possibility of retinal rivalry, but no parallax =
no stereo.)

{Marvin, I don't know if you're merely being argumentative, but clearly the
guy was asking whether the image in a flat photo that was photographed with
a stereo camera would somehow magically becomes stereoscopic. The answer to
the question he was asking is NOT yes. If I HAD told him yes- as you
suggest- would that be educating him?)


ron


ron labbe

studio3D
30 glendale st maynard, ma 01754
978 897-4221 fon/fax

mailto:ron@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://studio3d.com


------------------------------