P3D Re: good blurrrrrr

["Greg Wageman" <gjw@xxxxxxxxxx>]

From: John Toeppen <toeppen@xxxxxxxx>


>Tracking moving subjects -- blurred results can be better.  Do you
>really want everyone to look like wax cutouts all of the time?  The
>subjects are the sharpest thing in the frame - but even there the soft
>focus adds life.
>
>example at:
>
>DepthCharged: http://members.home.net/holographics/wr.htm
>
>JPG  http://members.home.net/holographics/wr.jpg


Works for me.  Nice job.

However, I'm certain not everyone will agree.  This is a long-standing
and deeply ingrained prejudice in the field.  Many books on
stereophotography forcefully proclaim that everything "must" be sharp,
front to back, and brook no exceptions.

I don't find that every example works, but I certainly think there are
some that do.  I'm still trying to quantify why.

     -Greg W. (gjw@xxxxxxxxxx)