Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
P3D Re: Sticking with beamsplitter
- From: pd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: P3D Re: Sticking with beamsplitter
- Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 09:12:57 -0600
Like many others, my first stereo pictures were taken with a stereo
adapter (the Franka, in my case). I've also tried the Stitz and the
Pentax. In general, these have certain strengths and certain
weaknesses. The main strengths are:
1) Can be used with modern, highly-automated cameras with excellent
optics.
2) No mounting to worry about.
3) Suitable for slides or prints.
The weaknesses are:
1) Tall, narrow frame format.
2) Slide viewer optics limited ... I got "ghosting" and reflections in
a lot of my slides.
3) Imposes constraints on focal length and aperture for shooting.
I moved to a Realist, and shot with one or more of those for several
years.
I'm now using a twin camera rig for almost all my shooting. This has
all the advantages listed above for splitters, and none of the
disadvantages. The one drawback I can think of is having to deal with
two slides instead of one, but this is a minor concern for me.
When the day comes that I have an "extra" $4000, I'll probably buy
some form of RBT.
I'll always keep a splitter, though, since I may want to try to use it
with a video camera, digital camera, etc.
-pd
--
--------
Peter Davis
Funny stuff at http://www.pfdstudio.com
List of resources for children's writers and illustrators at:
http://www.pfdstudio.com/cwrl.html
|