Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
P3D Re: Steve's twin rig
- From: Steve Berezin <sbere@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: P3D Re: Steve's twin rig
- Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 22:26:20 -0600
JNorman805@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
> Steve Berezin writes:
>
> Both cameras would face the same direction but one would be upside down.
>
> Is there something I may be missing? >>
>
> That's an interesting idea, if you are sure you want to go with a
> side-to-side horizontal format. But consider that the tripod sockets on the
> Canon Rebels are centered precisely under the lenses. Therefore, if you went
> with a vertical format, and mounted the cameras bottom to bottom by their
> tripod sockets, the lenses would be exactly at the same level. The rig looks
> a little odd, with the body of one camera offset from the body of the other,
> but the lenses point in the same direction. With a 12 mm thick wooden bar
> between the two camera bottoms, the interoccular distance is about 75 mm.
> That's a little hyper, but not too bad for any distance over 8-10 feet.
>
> Jim Norman
I have done that for verticals. What I did is fashion a bolt and cut it
so that both cameras would fit together without a bar in between them.
It was a bit tricky, because to put the cameras together it involved
rotating one camera to put it in. I was able to align the cameras
optically which was precise enough for my requirements. Doing this I
was able to get the interocular down to about 65mm. The cameras were
light enough to carry on their own using one strap for both cameras.
However I was constantly worried they would go out of alignment.
I am thinking of putting a thin metal piece in the back that would align
everything.
--
mailto:sbere@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.berezin.com/3d
Steve Berezin
Berezin Stereo Photography Products
21686 Abedul
Mission Viejo, CA 92691
USA
|