Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
P3D Re: Parallax tech, deviation
- From: Larry Berlin <lberlin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: P3D Re: Parallax tech, deviation
- Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 15:40:33 -0700
>Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999
>From: abram klooswyk <abram.klooswyk@xxxxxx>
>..........
>Since "parallax" is often also used in the sense of the
>linear shift on the stereopicture, it might be good to
>stress that this should be avoided.
>........................
>
>Koo Ferwerda had a degree in astronomy and wrote a thesis on
>an astronomical subject, it was not entirely on right-angled
>triabgles :-). Indeed, parallax is
>> not specific to astronomy
>but it does originate from astronomers, and it seems good to
>stick to their definition.
***** That's interesting.
>
>Ferwerda again points out in his book "The World of 3-D"
>(see http://www.stereoscopy.com/3d-books) that the parallax
>of a point is the angle, subtended at that point, of the "visual
>lines" from two different (viewing) positions.
>
>"Deviation" is the linear shift Greg mentions, by definition it is
>the difference of the separation of a homologous pair of
>points on the stereophotograph and the separation of a pair
>of very distant or "infinity" homologues.
>
>"Separation" again is the preferred word for the distance
>between left and right "items", to avoid confusion with
>distances in space, e.g. from the stereocamera to an object.
>
>Since we have these three dimensions, it is convenient to
>have accurate terms to avoid getting lost in space...
>
**** Thanks Abram. That was the definition I was looking for.
Larry Berlin
Email: lberlin@xxxxxxxxx
http://3dzine.simplenet.com/
|