P3D Re: What did I learn last night...

[George Themelis <gthemelis@xxxxxxxxx>]

--- Oleg Vorobyoff <olegv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I'm agruing that depth is fundamental to a good 3d photograph,
> not an afterthought.  

On the other hand, just because a picture had depth it does not
mean that it is a good photograph (i.e pleasing to see).

I think I am seeing the origin of our difference in opinion. 
The challenge for me is to produce a good photograph that has
depth.  As I have said before, depth per se is very low in my
list of qualities of a good stereo image.  You seem to have it
at the top.  

George

=====
George Themelis, DrT-3d@xxxxxxx
http://home.att.net/~drt-3d/
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com