Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

P3D R: P3D twinning panoramics

  • From: "Sergio Baldissara" <winter@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: P3D R: P3D twinning panoramics
  • Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2000 08:32:36 -0700
thaks, Rod
but my "problem" is still without solution: in the usual formula 'near point
ditance = (focal lenght x stereo base) /parallax', what "parallax" should I
consider?  3mm o smaller?
Sergio
> Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2000 21:46:02 -0700
> From: Rod Sage <rsage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >what maximal horintal separation of matching points (linear parallax)
> should
> >I consider? books recommend 1.2mm for 24x36 and  3mm for 6x6 negs, say
> 1/30
> >of horizontal side or roughly 2° viewing parallax.  In this case should
> I
> >consider the whole horizontal side or just an "angle of attention"?
>
> The Horizon uses a swinging 28mm lens. So calculate the stereo base as
> you would for any 28mm lens. The perspective is the same, only the width
>