Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
P3D Re: One Mount
- From: "David W. Kesner" <drdave@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: P3D Re: One Mount
- Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2000 13:20:41 -0700
In p3d digest 3754 Dr. T. writes:
>What is your point and how does that fit with the subject
>discussed?
responding to my post:
> There are people out there, such as Boris Starosta, that do
> have to compromise their original images if they want to be
> accepted in exhibitions.
This was in response to Mark Dottle's post:
> How would you go about standardizing mounts for competitions or
> programs where various people participate. And why should their
> entries be duped to conform to a mount? Nobody would agree
> on a specific mount to use.
I was simply trying to point out that people are already forced to
conform to a mount. Not a particular manufacturer or type, but to
standard sizes.
And just to cut you off, yes there are 2x2 exhibitions that Boris and
others can submit to, but the overwhelming majority are 41x101 (up
to 7p maximum) standards.
That's all for now,
David W. Kesner
Boise, Idaho, USA
drdave@xxxxxxxxxx
|