P3D your comments about my comments

[L <jet_lk@xxxxxxxxx>]

When I wrote:

>I am really sick of people that think 3-D
>is a great way to scam people out of money, but they
>don't even do there one stereo stuff, and obviously
>don't care about those of us that do.
>

I was refering to the "gallery" that they have on the
web.  The STOLE other's images, instead of using there
own.  And when I said they are bad for 3-D, It is
because they are misinforming the public about other
forms of stereo viewing with the intent to "trick"
them into using there format.  They claimed that
stereo movies were not in full color, and were
anaglyph, which is just not true in the least.  If
they do the tiniest bit of actuall research they would
have found that not to be true.  IT IS BAD FOR 3-D TO
TALK BADLY ABOUT THE PAST OF 3-D"

It is nice that they have someone (you) defending them
on this list, but do you have any understanding of
those who complained?  Have you ever put your images
on the web?  Have they ever been taken without your
permission.  There and have been dozens of companies
just like the one we have been discussing.  You
mentioned, "These retail for low prices and are high
quality/low cost items.".  Do you know that for a fact
(are you a proud owner of the product), or are you
just quoting thier web site.

Do you feel some sort of moral obligation to defend an
"on this list, defenseless" company against a few
individual artists that have been taken advantage of
by companies for years.  And you say that we are on a
soap box.

Lincoln


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com