Re: [photo-3d] Why not use a Realist?

[Brian Reynolds <reynolds@xxxxxxxxx>]

Jim Harp wrote:
> ... Before this I used the twin XR-10Ms only for scenics
> >> and saved my Nimslo for shots involving people and distances less than 12
> >> feet.
> >
> >Why not use a Realist?
> 
> Once you see those full-frame images, you never want to go back!  A perfect
> addition to my collection would be a Realist modified for 7P or a Belplasca,
> but those are a bit beyond my budget at the moment.  Jim Harp
> 

Or a Sputnik.  Once you see those full frame images (50x50mm mounted)
you never want to go back!

A sputnik with a flash, the aperture and shutter preset, pre-focused
based on DOF, and using the sports finder would be pretty close to a
MF P&S stereo camera.

-- 
Brian Reynolds                  | "Dee Dee!  Don't touch that button!"
reynolds@xxxxxxxxx              | "Oooh!"
http://www.panix.com/~reynolds  |    -- Dexter and Dee Dee
NAR# 54438                      |       "Dexter's Laboratory"

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Why buy CDs? Now you can swap for them. At Switchouse.com, you can 
choose from over 300,000 titles of every kind of music. Top 20 hits, 
R&B, hardcore, whatever. Get the music. Forget the money. Sound good?
http://click.egroups.com/1/3717/5/_/160438/_/956860644/
------------------------------------------------------------------------