Re: [photo-3d] Re: Camera separation in stereo photography

["don lopp" <dlopp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

So far I have been quite disappointed in the dicussion about camera
separation , it appears to me a case of the Blind trying to lead the Blind
with useless prattle about something  they know little about Don.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Abram Klooswyk" <abram.klooswyk@xxxxxx>
To: <photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2000 5:57 AM
Subject: [photo-3d] Re: Camera separation in stereo photography


> When Boris Starosta recently brought up the stereo base
> issue again (ofd calculator, May 24, 2000) I was surprised
> that so few and so quiet answers came.
>
> But now the issue seems to get it usual semi-religious flavor
> again, and appropriate body armor is taken out of the armory.
> Of course I cannot resist swinging my mace.
>
> Discussing camera lens separation without speaking of the way
> of viewing is meaningless in my opinion.
> In this thread (so far) only Greg Erker did it, I believe.
>
> A funny thing about Stephen Spicer's reaction on Ray Moxom's
> article in the Sydney Stereo Camera Club's "3d Window"
> (now at http://www.egroups.com/files/photo-3d/  -  BTW, from
> which issues of the 3d Window do these articles come?)
> is that Steve says that Ray, among the other "primary elements
> controlling the geometry of stereo photography", speaks about
> "viewer-lens focal length". However, I find no mentioning of
> that element in Ray's piece.
>
> Abram Klooswyk
>
>
>
>
>