Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
[photo-3d] Re: Camera separation in stereo photography
- From: Abram Klooswyk <abram.klooswyk@xxxxxx>
- Subject: [photo-3d] Re: Camera separation in stereo photography
- Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 23:36:23 +0200
Sergio Baldissara (29 Jun 2000):
>Fusion capacity physiologically varies between individuals:
>some skilled stereo watchers are even able to freeview
>stereocards in parallel format.
I don't believe the ability to freeview is the same as, or
even related to, the capacity to view large convergence
differences. These are essentially different skills.
don lopp (28 Jun 2000):
>I think the deviation numbers given are erroneous or being
>measured in a strange way ?
The strict definition of deviation is something like:
The Deviation of a pair of homologues on a stereo picture is
the difference between the infinity separation on the stereo
picture and the separation of that pair of homologues.
In looser usage, for the infinity separation (which is often
not measurable) the far point separation can be substituted.
In the stereo base discussions often the deviation of the mask
aperture is used. Its separation is easily measured on the
mount, and it is mostly known already. Then only the
separation of infinity homologues or of far points have to be
measured to compute the mask deviation on the mounted slide
(or card). This is often the largest deviation of the slide,
unless something gets "through the window.
Hardly any errors can occur in my opinion (if we stick to the
right terms :-)).
Abram Klooswyk
BTW: Can replies to posts please quote only the necessary, not
whole messages?
|