Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: [photo-3d] projectors/2x2/R-format/stereo window
- From: Mike Kersenbrock <michaelk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [photo-3d] projectors/2x2/R-format/stereo window
- Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2000 13:42:20 -0700
"David W. Kesner" wrote:
>
> Paul Talbot replies to psot from Mike K.:
>
> > > While that's true to some extent, the big problem with this
> > > approach for me is viewing images with a totally screwed up
> > > stereo window. While there is some instant gratification
> > > effect, the "window at infinity" (which to me is effectively
> > > no stereo window) really spoils much of the pleasure of 3D.
>
> Mike Kersenbrock replies:
>
> > Don't know if it's me (my eyes seem to adapt to most anything)
> > or maybe just luck, but so far I've found just putting the
> > store mounted 2x2 slides
> > (taken with an RBT X3B) into the 2x2 viewer looks
> > great 80% of the time,
>
> The confusion here is the use of the full frame RBT which does
> have a built in window so that commercially processed and
> mounted 2X2 will not have infinity seperation. The problem
> Paul is talking about comes from having two unmodified 35mm
> cameras or a single camera on a slide bar. Unless you "toe-in"
> the cameras then there is no stereo window. It is set at
> infinity which means the entire image is set out in front of
> the window.
I could be wrong, but I don't think my RBT X3B has any built-in
window, other than at infinity. The lenses are directly in front
of the exposure apertures as in the base XRX-3PF cameras, and I don't
think the apertures are modified. At least not in my 'B' version
(full 18/36 exp.w/full size frames so that standard store processing
and mounting of slides works great).
All I know is that dropping the 2x2's into the viewer, and setting the
interoccular adjustment of the
viewer at the "middle", works pretty well, even for my wife who has
problems looking at many viewers due to her slightly wider than average eye
spacing. Her eyes, opposite of mine, are "touchy" and the images need to
be reasonably close to "correct" as not to cause eyestrain.
Keep in mind that I'm of the opinion that one can get away with murder
when looking at stereo slides in a viewer -- while others gag if the
closest-in thing is as far as 6-inches behind the window. I like
everything, just some more than others -- rather than love'm or hate'm.
It takes hurting-my-eyes to make me not like something, and except for
extremes, it takes projection to do that. For me.
:-)
Mike K.
|