Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
[photo-3d] Re: Base Calculators
- From: Michael Watters <michael.watters@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [photo-3d] Re: Base Calculators
- Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 13:37:39 -0500 (Central Daylight Time)
> "Not a problem" in a hand viewer? Is Mr. Themelis suggesting that
> people can diverge their eyes more easily with a viewer? Or that it
> doesn't hurt as much?
I'd lay most of the blame on the polarizers used in
projection. In a viewer, each eye sees ONLY a single view,
which lets you get away with a LOT of stuff including
ultra-high contrast images and extreme 'p' values. In a
projected image you're always stuck seeing two images with
each eye. The polaroids filter out MOST of the alternate
image, but there is always some crosstalk. That's going to
make projected images much more sensitive to extreme
contrast or borderline p-values.
Similar story with a viewer Sawyer made for looking at flat
slides with both eyes. (It uses a 50-50 beam splitter to
divide the image) Most slides look just fine, but if you
stick a high contrast slide (night shots of lights) in the
thing there's ghosting all over it because of reflections
off of the 2nd (non-silvered) surface of the beam-splitter.
Mike
-----------------------------------------
Dr. Michael Watters
Email: Michael.Watters@xxxxxxxxx
Valparaiso University
|