Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
[photo-3d] Re:Kodaslide II (My use for stereo photography:)
- From: "Chuck Holzner" <cfholzner@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [photo-3d] Re:Kodaslide II (My use for stereo photography:)
- Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 01:27:18 -0000
--- In photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxx, Peter Homer <P.J.Homer@xxxx> wrote:
> Chuck Holzner wrote
A stereo slide that could be viewed on site could
> >be compared to the site to give a "Then & Now" comparison.
> >It would work best if the view in the viewer appeared to be the
same
> >size and depth as the view directly. One could even use one eye in
> >the viewer and one directly to the tower to see minor differences
> >with some practice.
>
> An idea of mine which I have not been able to put into practice yet
but
> which might be usefull for this sort of thing is to have a combined
stereo
> viewer/binocular. The eye pieces would be contained in a rectangular
> housing which could take a slide viewed by the eyepieces together
with the
> images from the objectives to enable the views to be directly
compared.
> P.J.Homer
We are working on the same idea, to compare a slide to the site where
it was taken.
I had been looking for zoom viewfinders to use for one eye while
looking at the slide with the other in the viewer. Binoculars make
the image look larger but the slide viewers make them look smaller.
You have to look at them both with the same magnification. It was
getting more complex (and expensive) then I wanted. Then I got the
idea to do them both with a 1X magnification thus removing the need
for the zoom viewfinder. The 35 MM lens viewer should work with any
slide taken with 35 MM lenses.
Another use would be to find the origonal site where some old stereo
view was taken many years ago with some camera unknown to you. You
could convert the view to a realist slide before going there but
would not know the effective focal length. You would be back to
needing some sort of zoom viewfinder. I would still like to do that
too.
There is another problem. The light level from the viewer must be
about the same as that from the view.
Chuck
|