RE: [photo-3d] Not buying an RBT S1

["Gabriel Jacob" <gjacob@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Mike K. writes:
>With all that said, if you offered a FREE RBT S-1
>or a FREE realist to a million photographers, how many do you
>think would pick the Realist.

Dr.T gives up and replies:
>More than those who would pick a free 8086 over a free
>Pentium 800MHz, that's for sure!!!
>
>Anyway, I've lost the point of this discussion...
>I give up!

Then Mike claims:
>You claimed that there weren't any modern "replacements" 
>for the Realist camera.  I said "fooey", sure there are.
>Because you have one, I used the S1 as my example.
>Personally, I picked an X3. You just now agreed with my
>comparison of the Realist/8086 vs S1/Pentium. Thanks,

I sez:
I don't follow the logic here. Agreeing to your comparison
question doesn't mean agreeing that it is a modern
"replacement." Is that what your implying (never assume
anything with Mike!).

Furthermore, the RBT is not a modern replacement. Your
comparing apples to oranges. The Realist was a mass
produced item, the RBT is not. There are no mass produced
3-D camera unless you consider the Argus, FED, etc.
replacements. I hope not!

I'm outta here!

Gabriel