Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: [photo-3d] Duh! Wrong film loaded.
- From: Linda Nygren <lnygren@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [photo-3d] Duh! Wrong film loaded.
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 08:25:02 -0500
Probably your best bet is to try Dale labs. http://www.dalelabs.com/
They can make slides from your negative film (they can do the developing
also or you can send them the UNCUT negatives) and send you the uncut
slides as well as your negs back. If you have the film developed first,
make sure to tell the lab not to cut the negatives. Dale could make
standard prints for you, but for the 5p you will want to talk a local
lab into doing this for you.
Cost for the slides from Dale is modest. When I tried it a few years
ago, I didn't think the quality was good enough to use this as a routine
prints + slides option, but I think they have improved their copy slide
film so in your situation it is probably worth a try. Some people have
used this option for View-Master Personal format if they know they will
want to make duplicates.
You may also discover the joys of making Holmes Cards. Several sites are
available on how to do this, or email me off line for more info. -Linda
peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> After a long time of absence, I'm back on the list. I see all the
> familiar names are still here!
>
> Anyway, my first question is quite an embarrassing one. I loaded the
> wrong film in my Realist and only noticed it after snapping a roll of
> film in Yosemite and Seqouia NP. I had loaded it - god knows why -
> with a Kodak print film as opposed to a slide film.
> So here I have this roll of film full of wonderfull stereo images on
> the wrong type of film.
> What can I do? I've checked with a professional film lab and they can
> reverse they film manually and expose it onto a new slide film. This
> will cost me about $20 per image! And they couldn't guarantee it
> would
> be without substantial loss of quality. The second option they
> offered
> was to develop the pictures as prints, then expose these onto slide
> film at a lesser cost of *only* $7 per image but this is second
> generation, so also a substantial loss of quality.
>
> Does anyone have any other ideas? Is there a way to view my Realist
> printed pictures in stereo using some other sort off viewer?
>
> Any help or ideas greatly appreciated!
>
> Thanks!
>
> Peter Muyzers
>
> PS: This new list is definitely a major improvement!
|