Re: [photo-3d] C.G. vs. real (was: Re: Digest Number 286)

[Ron Beck <rbeck@xxxxxxxx>]

Well, what would you call a photograph of a computer screen?  I can set
my camera up to photograph my display and thus meet your criteria that
the image was photographed.  I can also, with the proper equipment, send
my computer generated image directly to film and then send the roll in
to have it developed and mounted/printed.

It's not simple and the rules seem ambiguous enough to permit this in
certain circles.  Besides,
I've seen some of Boris' work and it's great!

Ron

Herbert C Maxey wrote:
> 
> >>Somewhere along the way I missed a bunch of posts (or a post) on the
> >>validity or suitability of computer generated imagery in a competition
> of
> >>photography.
> 
> Well, it is simple..... computer generated images are NOT photography. No
> Way, No how. So it seems clear that anything generated by the computer
> should be absolutely rejected. There are plenty of competitions for
> computer images.
> 
> Bob