Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

[photo-3d] Re: CGI


  • From: "Mike Kersenbrock" <michaelk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [photo-3d] Re: CGI
  • Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 22:15:25 -0000

--- In photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxx, Herbert C Maxey <bmaxey1@xxxx> wrote:

> I might get hammered for this comment, but I also have a problem 
with
> photographs that have been extensively corrected. I think less and 
less
> skill is needed to create photographs these days because the 
photographer
> realizes he has Photoshop to correct anything that is wrong. 

Takes no skill to fix things in Photoshop? Uh...... I
don't think so.  It's a great deal more complex than using
the camera where one's control of what goes on is very limited
(relatively).

However, if you mean in the sense that making a great realistic
2D photograph takes more skill than a great realistic 3D photograph
then I agree -- trying to do the same thing with less capable
tools takes more skill (assuming it can be done at all).

Mike K.

P.S. - Does using the computerized exposure mechanism in my
       RBT X3 camera cause problems too?  I've just gotten a
       computerized Jobo timer for my "darkroom" for home E6 
       processing. Reduces the skill needed to do the job 
       (using a wristwatch).  Problem?
       


> 
> Bob