Re: [photo-3d] Stereo Demise AND CONFUSION OF TERMS LONG POST

[Mike Kersenbrock <michaelk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Consider how surprisingly good 3Discover was, and then consider the
> public's complete rejection of the system. You had great stereo,
> well
> exposed, viewed in a nice viewer, but no public interest. If stereo

I didnt' buy a viewer either, even though I'll buy 3D most anything. Might
regret it someday, but I didn't want to buy until I found at least one
image set that I liked.  I looked a quite a few, and didn't like any of
them.  They were grossly hyper, and I personally don't like grossly hyper
images (although I appreciate that others don't mind or don't see it). Maybe
many others in the general public didn't like it either for the same reason.
One doesn't need to understand "hyper" to see it.

Mike K.

P.S. - Also, if it weren't for my 3D photography hobby, I'd never even have
       seen a 3Discover item.  Something to be said for that as well.