Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: [photo-3d] Hyperstereo artists?


  • From: "John A. Rupkalvis" <stereoscope@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [photo-3d] Hyperstereo artists?
  • Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 09:44:30 -0700

Hyperstereos obviously are not "normal" 3D photography.  And they definitely
could be considered an art form, a fascinating branch of stereoscopic
photography.

Interestingly, one of the widest usages of hyperestereos involves extremely
widebase images that are not made in the interest of art at all (but many
that I have seen certainly look artistic).

These (which very possibly could be the largest single use of stereo
photography of all) are the twin pass aerial images made for aerial mapping.
They have to be in stereo for drawing isolines on topographic maps,
delineating height boundaries.  I understand that the entire United States
has been mapped this way.

JR

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mojo " <mojo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2000 1:40 AM
Subject: [photo-3d] Hyperstereo artists?


> Hi everyone, I'm new to the group and relatively new to 3D.  I've
> learned a lot from reading the posts in here, and I hope to make this
> the first of many contributions!
>
> Anyway, I was wondering if there are any photographers who specialize
> in hyperstereo work.  As I was pondering 3D the other day, I suddenly
> became fascinated with the notion of hyperstereo, as it produces a
> result we are incapable of seeing otherwise.
>
> My thoughts went as follows: Normal 3D photography (in my opinion) is
> meant to capture the essense of a moment as it truly existed, and
> shows the viewer what they would have seen if they were standing
> where the photographer was when the picture was taken. Theoretically,
> if you were to visit that spot, what you see in reality would closely
> match the picture.
>
> Hyperstereo, on the other hand, presents us with a view that would
> be impossible to see in any way other than through photography - this
> notion makes me wonder if hyperstereo is more of an artform than
> normal 3D photography.
>
> Any thoughts or suggestions?
>
>
> Regards,
> Mojo
>
>
>
>
>