Re: [photo-3d] Re: Suitable subjects for 3d....

[Rory Hinnen <Rory.Hinnen@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Abram Klooswyk wrote:
<snip my own comments about water, people & stereo>
>
> Since Koo Ferwerda is no longer around to answer this, I might
> say something in defense.
> 

Please, don't misunderstand. I've been very experimental with my new
toy. I was surprised by the statement when I first read it, but as I
worked through more of the book, I came to realize Mr. Ferwerda's
emphasis is accurate recreation of the stereoscopic environment.

With that as a criteria, I might have to agree that water, movement &
people could be poor subjects. The aspect of freezing time becomes very
obvious, I think more so than in still photos, and in fact /time/
becomes the subject, rather than the objects in the picture or the
stereo effect.

.r.