Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

[photo-3d] Re: TDC vivid (8-perf w/ 65mm spacing)


  • From: Ralph Johnston/Linda Sherman <copley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [photo-3d] Re: TDC vivid (8-perf w/ 65mm spacing)
  • Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2001 08:27:26 -0500

The RBT "C" models do this but waste a lot of film.  Also, Gilde has
twinned a pair of Ricoh GR-1 cameras. (See photo in Stereo World)   He set
them at an angle on the bar so that one was behind the other and ended up
with 65mm lens spacing.  These cameras have 7-element 2-aspherical 28mm
f/2.8 lenses and are still available outside the USA.  The price is 250
lb-sterling = $375 plus shipping.  This is for the new model with a filter
holder and time/date option.


http://www.robertwhite.co.uk/35mmOthers.htm


http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~kennetht/GR1specs.html

I am working on a shutter release solenoid consisting of a coil and a
magnet to allow shutter sync without opening up the cameras.  They would be
taped or velcro'd on top of the cameras and activated via a battery and
pushbutton.  I love my GR-1 and if the solenoid works, I will buy another
and twin them.

Regards -Ralph

>________________________________________________________________________
>
>Message: 8
>   Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2001 19:57:44 -0000
>   From: "Chuck Holzner" <cfholzner@xxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: tdc vivid
>
>--- In photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxx, "Dr. George A. Themelis" <drt-3d@xxxx> 
>wrote:
>> Paul Talbot writes:
>> 
>> >The TDC Vivid has the lenses just over 65mm apart.  (Which
>> >happens to be a better match to average human eye-spacing.)
>> 
>> I would like to point out that the reason the TDC Vivid
>> was designed with a lens spacing of 65mm was not to obtain
>> a better match to the average human eye-spacing 
>> but because the camera was originally designed for the
>> 7 perforation format (like the Belplasca).  
>
>For whatever reason, it is a better match to the average eye-spacing.
>Wouldn't it have been nice if they had increases to loop size another 
>5 MM and went 8 perf?  Full frame with ortho spacing, WOW.  So close 
>and yet so far.
>
>Chuck
********************
Check out my six web pages

http://www.ultranet.com/~copley/
*********************