Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
[photo-3d] Re: Fast film in old cameras plus FEDS
- From: Ted Kraegen <e.kraegen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [photo-3d] Re: Fast film in old cameras plus FEDS
- Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 09:27:40 +1100
I had a recent experience where polarizers saved the day - while on a
six week trip with my FEDBOY the auto setting stopped working - I
diagnosed moisture from the bad european weather late last year after
replacing the battery didn't work - and I had to take pictures for
the next few weeks on the non-auto settings, where the least exposure
is 1/30 sec at f11. By dropping back to 100 ASA film and using
polarizers plus a hand meter I could cope with all but the very
brightest of days (maxed out on the reef in Belize!). Not optimal
particularly with the slow shutter speed, but the slides generally
look OK, at least to my relatively untrained eye.
Since I got back it was suggested that I should have bought some
neutral density filters, which I didn't think of at the time, but the
general use of polarizers seemed OK and had some obvious advantages.
Incidentally when I was walking along Waikiki beach on the last day
of the trip the camera auto setting has started working again. C'est
la vie!
Ted Kraegen
>
>Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 11:19:27 -0800
> From: "John A. Rupkalvis" <stereoscope@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: Fast film in old cameras
>
>
>Actually, a wide variety of films are available at an E.I. of 100, and
>shooting this at f/16 at 1/100 second is about right for normal bright sun
>shots (the f/16 rule states that the reciprocal of the shutter speed should
>equal the film speed at f/16 in bright sun). If you must cut the speed of a
>higher speed film, I would suggest that rather than wasting it with neutral
>densities, you use polarizers for controlling reflections, deepening blue
>sky, etc.
>
>JR
>
|