RE: [photo-3d] MF vs. 35mm stereo

["Gabriel Jacob" <gjacob@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dr.Dave gave his reasons for not persuing MF (yet).
>1) Not enough people to share with - both those taking MF and those 
>that have the equipment to view my work.
>
>2) No exhibitions to enter.
>
>3) No projectors for single dual aperture mounts.
>
>4) No quality dedicated stereo cameras.
>
>5) Cost of everything - film, cameras, mounts, viewers, etc. - is all 
>higher with MF.

Interesting and good answer, but this begs the question.

1) Why aren't there more people to share your work with?

2) Why aren't there more exhibitions to enter?

3) Why aren't there projectors for single dual aperture mounts?

4) Why aren't there any dedicated stereo cameras.

5) Why is the cost of everything higher?

Answer. Boils down to what Peter said, convenience and costs.

Gabriel