Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
| Notice |
|
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: [photo-3d] Re: Keystone Visual Survey Stereoscopes.
- From: "Ferguson Studio" <larry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [photo-3d] Re: Keystone Visual Survey Stereoscopes.
- Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 16:28:13 -0600
Boris;
Get a Telebinocular ! Take out the front plate and either use some other
light source or tilt the card forward 1/4" (I'm going to build a shim to do
this) and you will love it. George--how about a color correct bulb for this
machine and new front plate?
By the way, I'll get back to you on the lengthy slide vs. print thing. I've
got a museum show in a month and they are being very particular about no
penis's in the show ! I'll never understand this concept, full female
nudity is fine by no male frontal nudity. When will everyone grow up?
Larry
With -30 wind chill in Omaha NE (and I was just in Tampa, Florida with 70+
degrees) Yes, I did see the Superbowl (on TV, just like you)
----- Original Message -----
From: <boris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Dr. George A. Themelis <drt-3d@xxxxxxx>
Cc: <photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 4:13 PM
Subject: [photo-3d] Re: Keystone Visual Survey Stereoscopes.
> >> These are good for large prints, too, right? Like stereo pair prints,
> >> really big hanging on a wall? (Scope would be installed on pedestal).
>
> Themelis replies:
>
> >No, I don't think so! They use lenses so the image must
> >be at a certain distance from the lenses (to be in focus)
> >so this puts a limit to the size. Something with mirrors
> >(no lenses) would work better for very large prints.
>
> Oh, right. I am getting it confused with the mirror stereoscopes.
>
> No one has mentioned the view magic print viewers on list. They seem like
> a good value. ...But I like magnification.
>
> I may have to get a telebinocular...
>
> Boris
>
>
>
>
>
>
|