Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: [photo-3d] Digest Number 458


  • From: "Robert J. Vaughan" <k0mz@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [photo-3d] Digest Number 458
  • Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 19:03:36 -0600

Mike,

There is a film made for doing just what you want (I assume you want
color slides).  It is Kodak SO-279 and is balanced for tungsten light.  I
have used it many times for both title slides and positive slides from
color neg film and it works great.  Exposure is critical.
Robert J. Vaughan

> Michael Galazin wrote:
> 
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I've been wondering about something.  If you dupe a negative with 
> more
> > negative film, is the result a positive (e.g., a slide)?  I ask 
> for 2
> > reasons:
> > 1] Sometimes I might shoot some negative film, then decide I'd 
> like to make
> > a slide of a particular image.
> > 2] Much has been said recently about negative film's superiority 
> to slide
> > film in some regards.  The point of loss is in making the print.  
> If a slide
> > could result by making a negative of a negative, I'm hypothesizing 
> that the
> > resulting slide would be superior in those same respects to an 
> ordinary
> > slide (assuming a high quality duplicating lens).
> >
> > So, how about it?  What would one arrive at if duplicating 
> negatives with
> > more negative film?
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Mike Galazin