Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
[photo-3d] Re: Wide-angle Stereoscopy and the LEEP 2/2
- From: abram.klooswyk@xxxxxx
- Subject: [photo-3d] Re: Wide-angle Stereoscopy and the LEEP 2/2
- Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 14:23:15 -0000
In December 2000 there was a P3D thread on the LEEP.
The news about the LEEP system (Large Expanse - Extra
Perspective) was spread by Paul Wing in 1981, he wrote the
article in Stereo World (recently referred to in P3D), it was
in his column "Equipment Notes": "How about the LEEP system",
Stereo World Jul/Aug 1981 vol 8 Nr 3 pages 20-21.
I wrote on the news also in Jul/Aug 1981 (without having seen the
prototype) in the Dutch 3-D Bulletin Nr 57, and again in the
Jul/Aug 1982 3-D Bulletin Nr 63. First a price of $200 had been
mentioned for a basic LEEP system (camera and viewer).
I commented that I had doubts on possible quality for that price,
as a single 35 mm lens for a 6 x 7 camera (Pentax or Mamiya)
costed a multiple of that amount.
In an article in "Design News" Nr 21, of Sept 21, 1981 by
"East Cost Editor" David J. Bak: "Transparency 'corrects'
distortion, color fringing" was explained how the LEEP system
was supposed to correct lens errors.
"A wide angle photo-viewing system will impart distortion-free
color imaging with minimal fringing." "... the LEEP method
(...) a predetermined amount of positive distortion and
lateral chromatism. Transparencies display barrel-shaped
images and pronounced color fringing (...). When seen through
the magnifying viewer lenses, images are corrected in that
straight lines are straightened, and object appear as the same
size as at the original vantage point of the camera. The
system not only corrects distortions, but the color fringing
on the transparency substantially neutralizes the lateral
chromatism of the magnifier lenses."
A figure shows color fringing from a point source of white
light by a "simple camera lens" on film, and a symmetrically
placed "simple viewer lens" which unites the spectrum again
to a white line.
There was more about this in the description of the US patent
4406532, issued Sept. 27, 1983: "Wide angle color photography
method and system", inventor Howlett, Eric M.
(Today the full patent description is on-line, ref. see below,
fig.2 illustrates the "Neutralizing of Lateral Chromatism").
In short, it is proposed to correct camera lens color dispersion
by opposite viewer lens color dispersion.
Of course anamorphotic lenses are used in systems like Imax,
but only for geometrical transformations, not for handling
color dispersion. So at first the LEEP system seems a too
optimistic scheme, resembling trying to correct an out-of-
focus transparency by de-focusing the projector lens...
This seems in conflict with experience and laws of entropy.
(I'm working on my General Unified Theory of Garbage, which
will cover entropy, Bermuda triangle events, Murphy's law,
chaos, American President Elections, the second law of
thermodynamics and other strange phenomena).
Stereoprojection of slides is to some extent optically
symmetric to stereophotography, but stereoscope viewing is
not. In viewing, the lens makes a virtual image at the same
side of the lens as where the transparency (or photograph) is.
You cannot easily use a camera lens for viewing.
However, the patent description was accepted by the US Patent
Office, so there must be some truth in it, and indeed the LEEP
pictures seem to support the claims. If the claims of the
patent description are right, the LEEP viewer can only be used
to view pictures from the LEEP camera. (So I wonder if Don
Lopp has done that, or tried it with other pictures?)
>From 1982 I was one of the sponsors of the LEEP project, in
fact camera serial #32 would become mine (but never was :-( ).
I wrote to Eric Howlett about van Albada's efforts, and he
wrote back that he indeed had filed his patent application
with the van Albada paper as main reference (it is indeed in
the patent description).
The project went wrong as we know. There were some irregular
spaced newsletters from Howlett, who used the firm and brand
names LEEP, Stereovision, LEEPMA and Pop-Optix Labs in the
mailings. (One of the mailings included the sheet recently
uploaded to the files section by Rod Sage, it is in my LEEP
file, date Feb 1982. The lenses shown were from the production
series. The text gives pre-production camera details, which
slightly differ from the actually used specifications which
are in Werner Weiser's book "Stereo Cameras since 1930",
see reference in posting 04 Feb 2001).
In 1989 Howlett wrote: "In the middle of 1985 we actually
shipped three LEEP systems (...)". A foot note added that one
of them had "conked out".
This was not very encouraging, 8 years after the first public
LEEP announcements. Apparently financial and personal problems
were too great.
In the mean time I had seen Paul Wing's LEEP pictures (and his
camera) on several occasions, and I still hoped that the
production number would reach #32, but eventually Paul told me
confidentially that he didn't believe any more LEEP systems
would ever be produced, which till today seems right. A sad
outcome, but I would sponsor a new wide-angle stereosystem
again, if there was some change to buy one.
Abram Klooswyk
---------------
Below a summary of LEEP web references.
Patent text:
http://www.delphion.com/details?&pn=US04406532__&s_all=1
Patent figures:
http://www.delphion.com/cgi-bin/viewpat.cmd/US04406532__
LEEP "site":
http://world.std.com/~leep/cat003/arv-1.htm
Pictures of LEEP camera and viewer, on the
Stereo New England / PHSNE site:
http://www.phsne.org/stereocameras/35mm-rollfilm/leep.jpg
http://www.phsne.org/stereocameras/35mm-rollfilm/leep_viewer.jpg
----------------
|