Re: [photo-3d] RE: Depth ranges

["David W. Kesner" <drdave@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Paul Talbot writes:

> the triplet was not marked whether it was L-R-L or R-L-R.

It is L-R-L. I thought this was the "standard" and didn't need 
explanation - sorry.

> It would help if you posted a more modest-sized image.

Each image is only 400 pixels wide which makes a stereo pair 
800 wide. I thought this was a good size as most everyone is 
running at least 800x600 screens. I can easily freeview either 
parallel or cross-eyed at this size. What would be a "more 
modest-sized image"?

As I am doing a lot of scanning now in prepartion for my 
website I would like more feed back (personally as I am sure 
the list is not interested) on what is the "best" size for a 
stereo triplet.

Thanks,

David W. Kesner
Boise, Idaho, USA
drdave@xxxxxxxxxx