Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
[photo-3d] Re: To math or not to math?
- From: zilch0@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [photo-3d] Re: To math or not to math?
- Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2001 18:38:17 -0000
Hi!
--- In photo-3d@xxxx, "Dr. George A. Themelis" <drt-3d@xxxx> wrote:
> The professional's answer to unknown situations is
> "bracketing".
I bracket my exposures +/- 1/3 stop because it's relatively easy to
make an error in the use of my spot meter, but I do not bracket base
separation because I'm able to measure near and far point distances
quite accurately (with a laser rangefinder, tape measure, hand-labeled
distance scales on my lenses.)
These measurements not only guarantee that my base calculations are
right first time every time, they allow me to calculate the distance
to the plane of best focus without error and absolutely nail my DoF
calculations as well.
Indeed, the only thing I have to bracket is the exposure, so you are
quite right in saying that bracketing is a "professional's answer to
unkown situations." The part you seem to be missing is that with
the right techniques, very little is left "unknown."
Neglecting such attention to eliminating the unknown, I would have to
bracket for exposure, base, and to be confident, focus (DoF guessing).
Just doing three brackets for exposure, three for base and two for
focus, the combination would require shooting 18 frames. Film might
be cheap, as you say, but time isn't.
My calculator tells me what base separation to use to achieve the
precise on-film deviation that I have chosen - I adjust the base with
a metric ruler and consider this ability to deliver a consistently
predictable stereo "bite" to be precious. My calculator tells me
precisely which stop will deliver sufficient DoF to yield an apparent
7.5 lp/mm in my viewer - half again as sharp as the 5 lp/mm most agree
is sufficient to survive the scrutiny of an audience with healthy
eyesight. My calculator tells me precisely where to focus - I use the
laser rangefinder to identify a target at that distance, focus each
camera on that target and then restore my intended composition. There
really is no need to bracket these parameters because I've eliminated
the unknowns for these controls.
It feels great spending 10 to 20 minutes setting up a shot and then
walking away with only 3 exposure made. If using a calculator makes
me look unprofessional, I'll just have to look elsewhere for my
self-esteem... like in my stereo viewer.
Mike
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|