Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: [photo-3d] viewer optics
- From: "Dr. George A. Themelis" <drt-3d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [photo-3d] viewer optics
- Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 23:11:20 -0500
I am sorry, I am not an expert in optics but I do have
a few questions....
>Instead, we should compare
>them with other types of eyepieces that were standard by the 1950s, in
>binoculars, telescopes, and microscopes -- even inexpensive models. These
>were vastly better & show that the technology was available to produce a
>much better product.
How about if we compare them with other stereo viewers
(with achromatic lenses)?
> The Red Buttons are quite sharp mid field, as any decent eyepiece since
>the 1700s has been. But away from the center of the image, they show
>slight distortion (curved frame)
I think someone mentioned that even the deWijs lenses
show slight distortion. One of these lenses costs
more than the entire red button viewer.
>astigmatism (fuzzy edges), and curvature
>of the field (focus mid field, then to focus at edge of field you have to
>turn knob) to a degree that could have been inexpensively corrected in the
>1950s.
Are there any other stereo viewer lenses from the
1950s without these "features"? If I buy a pair
of "modern" achromats from Edmund Scientific (and
pay about as much as the entire red button viewer,
just for the pair of lenses) would these problems
be absent?
>Also, they were uncoated, at a time when most inexpensive optics
>were routinely coated; and this makes a big difference in reducing
>reflections off the eye lens and overall glare.
A big difference? I am not so sure....
> They could also have been made with enough eye relief to allow for use
>with spectacles,
I was under the impression that achromatic lenses
have zero eye relief, meaning that the minute you
start moving the eye away from the lens, you see
less and less.
> I admit that much of the problem with the Red Button as used today, is
>that we've adapted them to full frame use, and they were designed for
>Realist format.
I use them for wide RBT slides and I don't see these
problems... sorry...
George
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|