Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
[photo-3d] Re: viewer optics
- From: "John Goodman" <jgood@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [photo-3d] Re: viewer optics
- Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 23:06:23 +0900
This won't do justice to Paul Talbot's informative post on viewer
optics but, concerning "eccentric viewing", I recently discovered
something very surprising. I was playing around with the
interocular adjustments of several viewers, trying to get the
best "coverage" with 5p and wider slides, mainly with widened
viewers originally designed only for 5p.
Until now, I found the wider interocular settings more
"comfortable" (e.g. when the Realist red-button adjustment
lever is well toward the right). Such settings no doubt make it
easier to see the extreme left and right edges of a view, but at
the expense of the inner window edges.
I discovered, with the viewer lenses about a hand span away
from my eyes (~8 inches, ~20 cm), that in order to see the
same small part of the view centered in the left lens (with my
left eye), and centered in the right lens (with my right eye), the
interocular lens spacing had to be a *lot* less than I was used
to. I suppose this "reduced" spacing is approximately equal to
the mount window separation or the separation of the
respective homologous points that I was looking at in the slide.
These distances should be nearly the same (differing at most by
the on film deviation?), but there probably is some triangulation
involved since my interpupilary distance is ~68 mm.
So I wound up with the Realist lever slightly to the .left. of
center, and similar settings with other viewers. What struck me
was that this much "reduced" interocular setting, once I got
used to it, was quite nice, and seemed to offer an optically
more "balanced" view. Fwiw, ymmv, etc.
jeg
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|