Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
[photo-3d] Caamera spacing, apparent size and some depth charge info.
- From: "David Samuel" <dpsamu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [photo-3d] Caamera spacing, apparent size and some depth charge info.
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 09:06:16 -0000
If an image of a man standing, appeares on an 11 inch monitor at
800x600 res viewed from a distance of 36-40 inches from the monitor.
The image of the man will be 9 inches tall and 36 inches away.
My experience with 3-d has led me to beliave that the mind weights the
focal cue as the dominant cue as to the depth of the image.
In a 3-d image on a monitor, in order to have the correct width depth
ratio, in either eye image, the man should appear to be 9 inches (600
pixels)tall x 4.25 inches (400 pixels) wide x 4.25 (400 pixels deep).
To reconcile this with a real man 6 feet tall standing at a distance
of 12 feet from the cameras the camera spacing should be 8 inches to
result in the correct size depth ratio as it would appeare on a
monitor. Whatever your final mounted size you should take this formula
into account.
Depth Charge opened independent of a browser can view jpeg files
without renaming by swiching in the file types box. Although in the
file types box it has a bitmap type, my depth charge says that file
type is unsuported. Also if the image is higher than 600 pixels, depth
charge shrinks the image to fit the screen causing distortion
(foggyness). Although the context menu has a button to view actual
size it doesn't work.
If you have red blue anaglyf glasses you can see an animation file I
uploaded to the files area (if it's not too big, 600k) and see the
results of all of the above. Adults only please.
SAMU
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|