Re: [photo-3d] Re: HOT CHICK . . . .

["John A. Rupkalvis" <stereoscope@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Wier" <wier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 10:17 AM
Subject: Re: [photo-3d] Re: HOT CHICK . . . .


> >Please don't post any title like this to the group in the future.
> >This kind of language is highly offensive. If posible can the
> >moderators remove this message or alter the title?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Grant
> >
>
> I'll have to look into this. I've never tried to modify stuff already
> in the archives.
>
> --BW

That is ridiculous!  There is absolutely nothing offensive about the common
names for cute household pets, and anyone who thinks so must have a very
twisted mind.

Any attempt to prevent individuals from speaking their comments constitutes
an abridgment of their Constitutional right to freedom of speech, and such
illegal censorship will be reported to the ACLU and other authorities
responsible for guarding our precious freedoms.  The seemingly innocent act
of removing other's words is the first step to totalitarianism, as has been
proven over and over throughout history.

I will not overlook such fascist behavior.  You may be certain that I will
be among the first to take legal action against any such obvious
intolerance.

JR


 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/