Re: [photo-3d] Re: HOT CHICK . . . .

["John A. Rupkalvis" <stereoscope@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Shelley" <dshelley@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 1:52 PM
Subject: RE: [photo-3d] Re: HOT CHICK . . . .


Was it not you who just impuned
> another member if this group by publically calling them (and anyone who
> might happen to agree with them) an idiot?

The proof of that statement is becoming much more obvious.

> If the OWNER of this lists\chooses to block someone for any reason, that
is
> their right. Several people have been removed/blocked in the past. Neither
> you nor I have ANY rights as far as this list goes... If you don't like,
it,
> I invite you create your own list.

Quite to the contrary, EVERYONE has rights as to freedom of speech in
anything that is published (and therefore of public record).  The owner (was
there ever an actual purchase?) has just as much right as you or I to state
their opinions as well.

It is only when these rights are preserved in all publications that they are
of value.  It would also be undesirable for everyone to keep starting new
lists, as there are probably more than are necessary right now.  This list
could continue to be a valid forum for communication and education if it is
not subject to destructive selective content removal based upon any
particular individual's preferences as to what they might or might not like
to read.

You say that several people have been removed/blocked in the past.  That is
very sad.  I wonder what they might have contributed had they been allowed
to speak.

JR


 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/