Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: [photo-3d] Re: Chick & pussy
- From: Ron Beck <rbeck@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [photo-3d] Re: Chick & pussy
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 13:32:13 -0600
pennywise@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> How on earth can anyone find the title of this picture offensive????
> It describes perfectly what the picture shows.
> This seems to be a by product of our increasingly sad society.
> Now, if the picture had shown what the member expected to see - -
> that would have been very offensive.
Well, mainly because I receive approximately 10 "spam" emails from
various "people" (Shelly, Sandy, Dominique, etc...) all wanting me to
view their "18 year old antics", all totally unsolicited and apparently
gleaned from the common email address I use to sign up for virtually
everything. The title in question appeared to be another email of this
type. I've managed to filter most of it directly to my trash basket.
However some still gets through.
However, most spam I receive is directly to me and not from the photo-3d
list as this one was. The original was also from a list member known to
pull a prank or two from time to time. And, upon executing the link, I
found a cute picture. I was amused. The title was provided
specifically for its shock value and it apparently worked.
Now, I probably wouldn't pass it on to my mother, but Uncle Russ,
definitely!
> Recently, in England, a mother was arrested for taking nude
> photographs of her children - in the garden round the pool.
> How sad that some dirty minded photo processer saw this as
> illegal and phoned the police.
There was also a 20/20 type news show that reviewed this same "problem"
regarding nude photography. I personally have never had any problems
taking nude "bear skin" rug type photos of my kids. However, I am
careful to assure that their "private parts" are not visible in the
photos taken.
> There was a time, when families were families, when the naked
> child on the rug by the fire was a almost obligatory item in every
> photo album.
> Mind you, where child ponography is involved the perpetrators
> should be hung - - - - slowly.
> Tony UK
Well, I just hope I don't get arrested for the bath tub pictures I took
the other night with my Kodak stereo.
Regards,
Ron
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|