Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: [photo-3d] Re: Misalignments & stereo projection
- From: Project3D@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [photo-3d] Re: Misalignments & stereo projection
- Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 04:09:37 EDT
In a message dated 01/04/01 00:43:14 GMT Daylight Time, John Goodman wrote:
<< Bob Aldridge wrote:
> In a perfect world there would be no vertical misalignment
> in the slide mounting.
Am I correct in assuming that the "vertical misalignment" being
discussed means misalignment between the left and right
mount apertures, and *not* between the homologous points in
the image? I fully appreciate the importance of having the
mount aperture windows appear congruent on the screen, but
assume it is bad practice to adjust for vertical *mounting*
errors (misaligned homologous points between the two chips),
because this almost always ruins the on screen congruence of
the mount apertures.>>
For comfortable viewing of the image, the homologues should be at the same
height on the screen.
Unfortunately, three things can make one homologue higher than the other.
1. Bad mounting
2. Bad mounts with one aperture higher than the other.
3. Bad projection
The last one is easy to fix. Hire another projectionist :-) :-) :-)
2. will rarely be a problem - except with shows made up of slides from a
number of authors. The RBT mounts have gone a long way to eliminate mount
variations - particularly if you take care to put the two halves together
with the little groove on the top of both halves. Spicer mounts are also very
accurately made, and therefore consistent within each batch. The problem
comes with slides with a foil sndwich.
Here, unless the foil is EXACTLY the same height as the glass or card covers,
it will be able to go out of alignment. So, as the slide sits in the
projector on the edge of the COVERS, if the foil is crooked inside - even
1/10 mm - it will be out of alignment on the screen.
In all these cases, adjusting the projector will correct it, and the
apertures will be congruent on the screen.
With bad mounting, the height of the homologues will differ relative to the
apertures. If the projector is adjusted, the homologues will become level on
the screen, but the frames will not be congruent. The audience will see a
double edge at top and bottom. Whilst they may not actually be aware of the
reasons, the "soft" edge will not look "clean" and it will detract from the
overall impressioin.
So, as to the question of adjustments during projection, it would be good if
there were none, and in one's own personal shows this is easily achievable
with care in the mounting. With mixed shows, being realistic, there will
never be a time when slides are projected with a constant alignment unless
freedom of choice of mounts is removed from authors. Under these
circumstances, the projectionist should adjust the vertical alignment _of the
homologues_ smoothly and decisively as soon as the slid is on the screen, and
then focus it. This reduces the discomfort experienced by the audience to a
minimum - they may not even be aware of the misalignment because they only
get to see it on out of focus slides...
Bob Aldrtidge
Stereoscopic Society Projectionist
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|