Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: Computer Compositing


  • From: T3D Bill Stratemeyer <wwstrat@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: Computer Compositing
  • Date: Thu, 21 Nov 1996 23:59:54 -0500

T3D John Bercovitz wrote:
> Wow!  What an overload of mail on this subject.  I can't keep up!
> Bill asked what a good test subject would be.  I like a wireframe
> cube because humans really know what cubes look like so they can
> sense the distortion of a cube into various other six-sided figures
> which they are also very familiar with.  You have to be a critical
> viewer, though; come to the party with no preconceptions as to what
> the object's shape is.
  
   Since I did not see any apparent size change in my first
test I think there should be a better way to judge perceived 
size of a modified object.  I have been thinking that using
a square grid as an infinity background may be useful for this.
So wireframe objects might interfere.  Also a stereo pair with both 
an unmodified and modified objects in the same image pair might also
help judge any distortion.  If I had a DXF file of a tera fold knot
I could set up a test with it as this object might not give the
viewers much preconceived shape information?

Thanks
Bill Stra...


------------------------------

End of TECH3D Digest 39
***********************