Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: closeup lens focus
- From: T3D john bercovitz <bercov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: closeup lens focus
- Date: Sun, 22 Dec 1996 16:45:50 -0800
OK, I've got it figured out. Both ways are correct. The problem
was, we were talking about apples and oranges. The easy way to
look at it is as Dick Koolish and Michael Gordon suggested. But
that only works precisely in the one special case where the prime
lens is set at infinity and the object is at the front focus of
the auxiliary (close up) lens. What I was talking about, and
temporarily forgot I was talking about (an unfortunately
increasingly frequent event), was the combination of two lenses
becoming one equivalent lens. In that case, as it turns out, you
measure from about the junction of lens and SLR camera body.
The first way of looking at things only works when the prime lens is
set at infinity. The reason I made the spreadsheet (now at T3D's
web site) to calculate the one lens from a combination of two was to
allow a person to use the (limited) focussing ability of the prime
lens to shift the combination lens into focus.
So let's compare the two methods in the special case mentioned
above. If we plug into the spreadsheet a +1 (1000 mm) lens located
50 mm from the prime lens, then we find that the combination lens
also has a focal length of 50 mm and that the front principal point
is unmoved (it is still at about the junction of lens and body).
However, the back principal point has moved forward 2.5 mm. So its
distance from the film is now 52.5 mm rather than 50 mm. The object
is located at 1000 mm from the front of the combination which is
1050 mm from the front principal point, since the front principal
point wasn't moved. Now we check these figures:
1 1 1
- = - + -
f s1 s2
1 1 1
- = - + -
50 1050 52.5
And it checks. So either method gives the same result in the
special case. The easier method just doesn't apply in any other
case so you're stuck and have to go to the spreadsheet.
Now let's look at a case where this additional complication would be
useful. A 50 mm prime lens for an SLR ought to have at least 4 mm
of adjustment; it probably has more. So what happens when we put on
the auxilliary lens and focus out 4 mm? Where should the object be
now? The new focus is 56.5 mm from the rear principal point (if we
still use a +1) and the lens combination focal length is still 50
so the object must be located 435 mm from the front principal point
(juncture of lens and body) or 435-50 = 385 mm from the front of the
auxilliary lens. Since I want to make sure, I go to to the optical
bench and set up the experiment and find... Yup, it's about 385 mm.
John B
------------------------------
|