Re: Georges bashing of John Ohrt

[T3D Dr. George A. Themelis <fj834@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>   George.......  Were you having a bad day yesterday or what?!

No worse than today....  ;)

>I read John's post that you commented on and didn't find it that
>bad or confusing.

I am glad!  That's why I asked "is it just me?"

>I think if he made some of his statments any
>more brief it would not have been as clear, I followed most of
>what he was trying to say.  I know you are a technically minded
>guy so it shouldn't have been too hard for you to follow or infer
>most of what he was trying to say.

Being technically minded is my problem I think.  When someone is going 
to explain to me a technical problem, I expect to see an introductory
statement of what the problem/objective is, followed by the solution/
discussion, followed by conclusions.  That structure I did not see in
John's posting and I was not able to follow it and understand it.

>So, what I'm saying here
>is.... John, don't take what Goerge said personally.  He must
>have been having a bad day or something, thanks for posting what
>you did.

I forget his exact words but in his introduction he said that he would not
mind any criticism, so I believed him and gave it openly.  It might have not
been very constructive, but having missed the dissusions that brought this
summary and not being able to follow this posting, that was the best I
could do.  Still, I don't think what I wrote deserves the title: "Georges
bashing of John Ohrt". I don't know the man and I am not bashing anyone.
I just wrote my sincere opinion about a posting that he happened to write.

George, having just another bad day...


------------------------------