Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
weighting depth clues
- From: T3D john bercovitz <bercov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: weighting depth clues
- Date: Fri, 18 Jul 1997 15:20:16 -0700
I wonder how depth clues are weighted. For my talk at NSA
on the geometry of perspective, I showed slide pairs of a
some cars. The pairs were taken with normal, short, and
long lenses. When the audience viewed the pair taken with
the short lens, they were sitting three times too far from
the screen for correct perspective so the cars' geometric
reconstruction was three times too long (stretch).
Although the cars appeared very long, they did not appear
three times too long. I believe this illustrates the effect
of the eye/brain overriding the geometric reconstruction
with prior knowledge. The effect of using a lens which is
too short was dramatic in mono as well as in stereo. I
believe this means that the "stadiametric" system was in
use: We know the height of the front of the car and the
height of the rear of the car so we know their relative
distances and from that the relative length of the car.
(The heights of parts of the car appear unaffected by the
stretch condition which is expected from the geometric
reconstruction.) So what can you tell us about how depth
clues work together, Jim? What overrides what under what
conditions? Is the internal model sometimes a stronger
clue and sometimes a weaker clue according to how well
we know the object?
Thanks,
John B
------------------------------
End of TECH-3D Digest 180
*************************
|