Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
T3D Re: stereo math
- From: michaelk@xxxxxxxxxxx (Michael Kersenbrock)
- Subject: T3D Re: stereo math
- Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1998 11:40:33 -0700
> > And is any of this related to the reason why perfectly mounted slides
> > don't look right when projected?
>
> I'm not sure what you mean but I'm limited by the internal concept that
> "perfectly-mounted" means "projects well". Can you give me an example?
> I'm sure that would clear things up for me.
I think he means what I mean (sometimes) in photo-3D. If the purpose
of mounting a slide is for hand-viewer viewing, what constitutes "perfectly
mounted"? Aren't the mounting requirements numerically different than for
projection mounting?
To be more complete, the oldest-quoted question above probably should read
"And is any of this related to the reason why perfectly mounted-for-viewer"
slides don't look right when projected?"
And when one means projection, use perfectly-mounted-for-projection.
The ambiguity arises I think because most people probably don't have
projectors, so the "default" for "perfectly mounted" may be for
viewers, rather than for projection where a technical-oriented person
would put the default (because it's the worse case condition).
Mike K.
>
> Thanks,
> John B
>
>
------------------------------
|