Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

T3D Re: stereo math


  • From: michaelk@xxxxxxxxxxx (Michael Kersenbrock)
  • Subject: T3D Re: stereo math
  • Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1998 11:40:33 -0700

> > And is any of this related to the reason why perfectly mounted slides 
> > don't look right when projected?
> 
> I'm not sure what you mean but I'm limited by the internal concept that 
> "perfectly-mounted" means "projects well".  Can you give me an example?  
> I'm sure that would clear things up for me.

I think he means what I mean (sometimes) in photo-3D.  If the purpose
of mounting a slide is for hand-viewer viewing, what constitutes "perfectly
mounted"?   Aren't the mounting requirements numerically different than for 
projection mounting?

To be more complete, the oldest-quoted question above probably should read

"And is any of this related to the reason why perfectly mounted-for-viewer"
slides  don't look right when projected?"

And when one means projection, use perfectly-mounted-for-projection.

The ambiguity arises I think because most people probably don't have
projectors, so the "default" for "perfectly mounted" may be for
viewers, rather than for projection where a technical-oriented person
would put the default (because it's the worse case condition).

Mike K.

> 
> Thanks,
> John B
> 
> 


------------------------------