Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
| Notice |
|
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: IR and Flash Photography
- From: "Willem-Jan Markerink" <w.j.markerink@xxxxx>
- Subject: Re: IR and Flash Photography
- Date: Tue, 20 Aug 1996 14:51:41 +0000
On 20 Aug 96 at 10:10, Steve Homer wrote:
> >From: "Willem-Jan Markerink" <w.j.markerink@xxxxx>
> >
> >How did you set your flash meter for HIE & #87C?
> >The same as outdoors, 10-12 ASA?
>
> I set my flash meter for ASA50, and the negatives
> are maybe a half-stop thinner than I'd like. Outdoors I was
> getting an effective ASA of 800 with the 87C.
> 10-12 ASA, really? Are we comparing ASA's to DIN's
> or something? That's a pretty wild variation.
Nope, with a bare outdoor metering, I set my Gossen Sixtomat Digital
to 12 ASA. Kodak recommends 10 ASA btw.
Are you sure you don't mean the 'through-the-filter' [as from now
declared TTF....:-))] reading with either the TTL camera meter or
the hand held meter??
> I used TMAX developer, probably not a great choice,
> but what I had on hand. If I'm concerned above all with
> getting less grain, and don't mind sacrificing film
> speed, what developers would people recommend?
>
> >Just a thought: you might run into a Schwarzschildt effect you've
> >never seen before....1/1000s is not something the Konica engineers
> >would have been worried about when they wrote the spec sheet....;-))
>
> Could you give us a brief lecture on Schwarzschildt effect? ;-)
I was hoping noone would ask....it might be opposite to the original
problem: AFAIK, Schwarschildt discovered that long exposures need
additional time to get the same results as was calculated. Caused by
slower acting film when few photons hit the film. I am not
sure if this phenomena equals the requirement of *less* exposure at
very short shutter times, I somehow feel it should also require more
exposure than calculated.
> Unfortunately, she didn't show up.... Next month, she says.
>
> Seriously, though, I've tried split-filter printing
> to get local contrast enhancement of tattoos against
> light skin. I'm experimenting with the IR
> films to try to accomplish the same thing.
>
> If only the SFX-200 was available in medium format....
> My flash system isn't powerful enough to get a useable
> depth of field for portraits with the Konica.
I believe Ilford said about other formats: 'If demand permits'.
So start hassling every Ilford rep you encounter!....8-))
--
Bye,
_/ _/ _/_/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/_/
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
_/ _/ illem _/ _/ an _/ _/ _/ arkerink
_/_/_/
The difference
between men and boys
is the price of their toys
<w.j.markerink@xxxxx>
[note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!]
------------------------------
Topic No. 17
|