Re: WJ sees Red!! (was: hoya R72 Filter)

["Willem-Jan Markerink" <w.j.markerink@xxxxx>]

On 29 Aug 96 at 20:04, Chris Hulme wrote:

> Yes, you're quite right, I'm afraid this is my fault. This thread has 
> become somewhat confused by my mixing up the definition of 'opaque' 
> with 'translucent'.  Apologies to the List all round and to 
> Willem-Jan!!  This of course makes Willem-Jan's original comments 
> regarding this subject entirely correct.

<grin>
I wasn't quite sure my dictionary was correct at all....it was a 
English->Dutch dictionary, and I successively translated the 
explanation of opaque back to English....tricky procedure....8-))
 
> In my (feeble) defence, I blame the UK photopress for planting the 
> 'O' word in my mind in the first place!!  :))

Send complaints to those mag's!....8-))
 
> > Ah yes, that's better, more like 'the world according to Willem'....:-))
> 
> for ever and ever Amen!!  :)))

Eh....those donuts should be eaten, not be hovering above my head!

Saint Willem has spoken....;-))

(does anyone know how Saints look on IR??)

 
--
Bye,

       _/      _/       _/_/_/_/_/       _/_/_/_/_/
     _/  _/  _/               _/       _/  _/  _/
     _/  _/ illem    _/     _/ an    _/  _/  _/ arkerink
                     _/_/_/  


The difference 
between men and boys
is the price of their toys

<w.j.markerink@xxxxx>
[note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!]

------------------------------

Topic No. 17