Re: Books on Infrared Photography

["Willem-Jan Markerink" <w.j.markerink@xxxxx>]

On 14 Sep 96 at 2:28, Robert Long wrote:

> On Fri, 13 Sep 1996 19:11:07 +0100, George Smyth wrote:
> 
> |> And how does it compare in your opinion to the Kodak book Applied
> |> Infrared Photography from 1981?
> |
> |Sorry, I was never able to get ahold of that ublication.
> 
> I have a copy that I would be willing to loan for a copying project if
> one goes forward.  I don't use a copier and would have to do it on a
> scanner, which would take forever and be less successful on the b&w
> images.  But there are a few useful color images, which would not fare
> well in a regular copier.  It's 88 pages plus the four cover pages,
> which include useful material as well.  It includes a 210-item (!!)
> list of references, plus an "appendix" of "recent" publications on the
> subject, by the way.

I have a copy, albeit at least a 'second generation' one, not the 
first copy. Received it from Cagdas (thanks!), and already have an 
easy to copy non-binded (sp?) set of it.
I can throw it in a large copier and have it spit out multiple times 
without any additional effort. 
 
> I also have a copy of Kodak's _Infrared and Ultraviolet Photography_
> (Sixth Printing, 1959).  It's much more basic and smaller (half-size,
> 48 pages + covers) and aimed somewhat more at pictorial use, as
> opposed to forensic or scientific purposes.

I have an original '47 and '52 edition of this one as well.
Was more for collecting IR-odds-and-ends than for content.

 
--
Bye,

       _/      _/       _/_/_/_/_/       _/_/_/_/_/
     _/  _/  _/               _/       _/  _/  _/
     _/  _/ illem    _/     _/ an    _/  _/  _/ arkerink
                     _/_/_/  



      The desire to understand 
is sometimes far less intelligent than
     the inability to understand


<w.j.markerink@xxxxx>
[note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!]

------------------------------

Topic No. 9