Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
| Notice |
|
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Infrared (900nm) light is refracted less than visible light (400-700nm) hence the mark.
- From: "Thomas H. Hogan" <flzhgn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Infrared (900nm) light is refracted less than visible light (400-700nm) hence the mark.
- Date: Sun, 29 Sep 1996 12:01:58 -0700
There is probably not enough difference between 700nm and
750 nm. Probably not enough to merit putting a mark on the
lens to get the tiny amount of increased focal length
required.
The infrared index mark is intended to show the increased
focal length required to bring light of the longer 900nm
wavelength (to which only a few films like Kodak High Speed
infrared are sensitive) into focus.
Some lenses like mirror lenses even focus infrared light
to nearly the same degree as visible light and do not
require an infrared focus mark.
I have a little 35mm to 70mm lens that does not have an
infrared focus index mark (red mark) on it. I have used it
with many infrared exposures both with the #87 wratten filter
(800nm ?) and a number 25 (600 to 700 ?) using both Tech Pan
and Kodak High Speed infrared). It does not seem to require
any adjustment for wavelength. Perhaps the chromatic aberration
correction technology has improved.
Does anyone know if the knew hybrid aspheric lenses need
correction for infrared?
Hank Hogan <http://www.pic.net/~flzhgn/>
------------------------------
Topic No. 6
|