(Fwd) EOS and IR film

["Willem-Jan Markerink" <w.j.markerink@xxxxx>]

Just curious: did the message below reach all of you?
It ended up in my private mailbox, since it didn't match the @a1.nl 
filter....yet I am baffled as to why it is sent from the @a3.nl 
server....I know this domain exists at my provider, but merely as an 
(old) alias, not as a real system. 
Baffled.


------- Forwarded Message Follows -------
Date:          Mon, 7 Oct 1996 17:01:56 +0100
Reply-to:      infrared-photography@xxxxx
From:          tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Tom Benedict)
To:            w.j.markerink@xxxxx
Subject:       EOS and IR film

I've been using a Pentax K1000 for all of my IR work, but finally started
using my Canon A2.  Unfortunately it's one of the cameras that has an IR
sprocket counter rather than physical gears, so it's got a reputation of
either partially or totally fogging IR film.  I've heard everything from
"Don't use it!" -- Canon, to "It'll only fog the sprocket holes" -- Friends
of mine with nothing to lose.

I'll develop the film tonight and hopefully make some prints for the IR
Gallery.  At the same time I'll make a contact print and scan it in so
the Gallery will have an example of what IR film looks like when run
through an EOS body.

Tom

--
Bye,

       _/      _/       _/_/_/_/_/       _/_/_/_/_/
     _/  _/  _/               _/       _/  _/  _/
     _/  _/ illem    _/     _/ an    _/  _/  _/ arkerink
                     _/_/_/  



      The desire to understand 
is sometimes far less intelligent than
     the inability to understand


<w.j.markerink@xxxxx>
[note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!]

------------------------------

Topic No. 10